Joshua Kalsakau, Andrew Napuat, Phillipe Carillo
WHO has a plan for you
Aired On: February 9, 2024
Episode Description
Vanuatu is a small country in which its government stopped listening to its citizens but rather followed the dictates of the WHO. Citizens were frightened over the scourge of covid. The population was threatened with losing all societal privileges if they refused to get the vaccination. Yet, they did not have serious issues with covid which appeared like a flu, but there were serious side effects including death from the vaccines. Informed consent was violated as all requests concerning the contents of the vaccine were not answered. All information questioning the narrative was censored, People were threatened with the possibility of arrest if they spoke out against the narrative. Social media as well censored them. Their news media were paid to not publish anything regarding the danger of the vaxx. As they are a small country, they could easily see what was going on in their country They observed that WHO coopted their government and worked directly against the interests and the health of the citizens. Could this happen to the rest of the world?
WHO has a plan for you
Joshua Kalsakau, Andrew Napuat, Phillipe Carillo
- The government appears to have gotten in the way of the population’s attempts to get well. Supplements are not encouraged, and successful treatments for the COVID-19 virus were blocked (ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine).
- Why is there so much censorship of scientific medical information?
- The WHO /EU believes that misinformation is the most serious problem and that more censorship is required
- US Homeland Security circulated a memo that anyone who “makes the government look bad:” is a domestic terrorist
- US government job search memos were distributed to hire people to round people up in health emergencies and for people to work in the camp that the rounded-up people were brought to.
- Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wants the WHO to make climate change a medical emergency
- The WHO pandemic preparedness treaty was signed by 196 nations in 2005 to agree on pandemic planning. The WHO website indicates that the results of their planning carry the force of law
- In the pandemic, the government introduced seven policies led by WHO
- After their independence in 1980, they believed that WHO gave information on health policy and ran the day-to-day activities of their government
- The speakers were unhappy because they believed WHO had an advisory role not a role of dictating policy.
- WHO managed the censorship, lock down policies, masks, and vaccines
- WHO asked the parliament to pass a law to give indemnity to vaccine manufacturers
- WHO controlled the narrative and information provided
- WHO said that the whole population will be wiped out if the vaccines are not given.
- They vaccinated a lot of people before covid came into the country
- They enforced lockdowns
- People realized that the virus was not serious, like the flu and that the program was a scam.
- These measures adversely affected the economy: no tourists came in. All the restaurants and hotels were closed. This affected the whole countries
- WHO put a lot of money into this program buying new boats and trucks. They went to remote islands where people do not travel. They were incentivized to vaccinate all people
- People had severe side effects from the vaccine. They viewed this as an exercise to destroy the population
- There was an excess mortality, and people noticed. People attributed these excess deaths to the vaccine
- Deaths increased two to three times
- Mostly young people died from the vaccine
- They noticed that the folks who received the vaccine were sicker.
- The affected people were not bold enough to speak out
- People were doing this because of money. WHO paid the government to do these things
- Nurses were paid to travel to remote areas where few traveled to give the vaccines
- People were brainwashed, and censorship prevented information to get to the public
- His local videos caused his YouTube account to be shut down twice
- The local newspapers received money to promote the vaccine
- Any stories questioning the vaccines were not published.
- The Council of Ministry decided to would threatened to arrest people who speak out against the vaccine roll out.
- No one knew what was in the vaccine or the side effects. There was no informed consent, and people were not given a choice..
- They said the vaccines were safe for the people.
- People were forced to get the vaccines
- People were not allowed to cross check points
- They said if you don’t get vaccinated, you won’t travel, go to the bank, medical centers, sports events, shops, market place or government offices
- Doctors did not speak out as they feared losing their jobs. They lost their jobs if they spoke against the vaccine.
- These events violated their constitution where they have freedom of speech and movement
- The WHO and the government were partners in carrying these actions out.
- He states this program was for depopulation
- “There were three times more deaths than before the death vaccination.”
- They wrote to the Ministry of Health demanding an answer, but the Ministry did not answer.
- The WHO treaty to be voted on in May 2024, will undermine Vanuatu’s sovereignty
- Non-elected people will make decisions
- Summary
- Mandates, censoring, taking away liberties, removing medical choices are going on through out the world. Is this happening in other countries